Week In Politics: Presidential Candidates Release Health Records

No Comment 0 View


Today, Donald Trump finally certified something that he, for a prolonged time, refused to acknowledge.


DONALD TRUMP: President Barack Obama was innate in a United States – period.

MCEVERS: Trump has questioned a president’s place of birth for years. The White House even constructed President Obama’s U.S. birth certificate a few years behind to try to finish a rumors. So since a remarkable shift? With us to speak about this and other domestic news are a weekly commentators, E.J. Dionne of The Washington Post and Brookings Institution and David Brooks of The New York Times. Welcome to both of you.

DAVID BROOKS, BYLINE: Good to be here.

E J DIONNE, BYLINE: Good to be with you.

MCEVERS: So, David, since would Trump move this adult again today?

BROOKS: we theory he thinks it’s going to win him votes among a people he’s annoyed 8 million ways before. I’m not certain it’s going to work out. This matter that his debate put out – he’s often, in a past year or so, been on opposite planets from existence – though he was in a opposite universe.

The thought that Hillary Clinton started this whole thing and that he is a dauntless truth-teller exposing a actuality of it is so distant from what indeed happened, if we go behind and demeanour during Donald Trump’s tweets on this subject, it’s mind-boggling. And nonetheless it – we consider it’s a debate of impassioned cynicism that we don’t unequivocally have to try to even come tighten to a plausible story. We contend what we want, and it doesn’t seem to harm us.

MCEVERS: And Trump built adult this press discussion by saying, we know, he was going to make a vital proclamation on Twitter. And then, afterward, CNN’s John King pronounced something we don’t mostly hear from a media. He pronounced this.


JOHN KING: We got played again by a Trump campaign, that is what they do. They – he got a live event, promote for about 20-something minutes.

MCEVERS: And, we know, here we are articulate about it. E.J., what do we think, are we being played? What’s going on here?

DIONNE: Oh, we consider Trump has played a media all year long, right from a commencement of his campaign. But in this case, we consider this play will come right behind opposite himself. As David suggested, interjection to his abounding story of tweeting, we know what he pronounced about this in a past.

And we consider bringing this adult now and a approach his debate rubbed it – they’d kind of been articulate about it for days – he will eventually contend this, Trump is observant we will usually contend it when I’m prepared – usually calls courtesy to something that has done him deeply offensive, utterly to – utterly to African-Americans, though also to all kinds of fair-minded Americans who looked during a contribution and said, what in a universe was this man doing claiming that Barack Obama was innate anywhere though Hawaii? And afterwards fibbing about Hillary Clinton’s past, sure, maybe some Clinton chairman somewhere behind there pronounced something, though Hillary Clinton has never been a birther, and so he transposed one distortion with another.

MCEVERS: There are a lot of new polls out this week – lots of – lots of numbers. But a prevalent account from these numbers is that this competition is removing tighter. E.J., is this about Trump removing stronger or about Clinton removing weaker?

DIONNE: we consider roughly each change that we’ve seen given a conventions has not been since one side had huge positives, nonetheless we consider Clinton did benefit something herself from her convention. It’s mostly ’cause a other side creates mistakes or things viewed to be mistakes. And a basket-of-deplorables criticism that Clinton made, that can be shielded on a contribution when we demeanour during what Trump supporters indeed believe, though it’s never a good thought for a claimant to impersonate a other side’s supporters.

And afterwards her removing ill in a context of a Trump people swelling all these rumors arrange of left her in a formidable place. And I’m still struck by a fact that, even after weeks like this, Trump closes a gap, though he can’t tighten it all a approach and that his – he’s still not all that clever among white voters, whom he contingency win by strenuous margins.

MCEVERS: We see Trump relocating forward in bridgehead states like Ohio and Florida. And while we did hear some good news this week from a Census Bureau about how a economy is recuperating and salary are going up, it’s not indispensably so in some of these bridgehead states. Is that a factor, David?

BROOKS: Yeah, we don’t consider so. If a – if short-term mercantile changes were – and a economy’s improving – you’d consider Clinton would be improving, not sliding. So it doesn’t – it’s not a neat correlation. we do consider that we have to conclude a enterprise for change as only super-strong in this country.

And Hillary Clinton, for all her virtues, does not seem like a transformational candidate, and Donald Trump does. And so as prolonged as he can have a tolerably terrible week, he seems to do well. And so only being – removing a D-minus seems to be good adequate for him to – people get a small some-more accustomed that, oh, during slightest this man will move some change.

And we do think, for those of us who are not in adore with a thought of a Trump presidency, it’s not utterly time to panic, though it’s removing there.

DIONNE: One thing I’d contend is a lot of Democrats – and this underscores something David said. A lot of Democrats say, since in a universe isn’t Hillary Clinton forward of this man by 20 points? And we consider a answer is, A, she’s perplexing to follow an obligatory of 8 years, and she’s in a same party.

And while Obama’s popular, electorate don’t mostly do that. And two, while a new mercantile news was spectacular, utterly for people during a bottom of a economy, a lot of electorate are still meditative long-term decrease going all a approach behind to 1999. So there is some breeze in her – in her face in this election. And that’s since she doesn’t – hasn’t been means to build adult an huge lead.

MCEVERS: Both candidates, of course, spent a lot of time articulate about their health this week, this after Hillary Clinton’s fall during a 9/11 commemorative use and a after information that she’d been diagnosed with pneumonia though hadn’t announced that. Clinton, of course, after expelled her medical records, and her alloy pronounced all was fine. Soon she was out campaigning in North Carolina.


HILLARY CLINTON: we have to say, it’s good to be behind on a debate trail.

MCEVERS: And afterwards Donald Trump went on “The Dr. Oz Show” and did what seemed like a scripted exhibit of his medical records. Let’s hear that.


MEHMET OZ: If your health is as clever as it seems from your examination of systems, since not share your medical records? Why not let people…

TRUMP: Well, we have unequivocally no problem in doing it. we have it right here. we mean, we – should we do it? we don’t care.


MCEVERS: And one thing that struck me as we were going by all these health annals this week – cholesterol levels, weight, blood-thinning medicine – we couldn’t assistance though think, are we unequivocally doing this, going into this many fact given that presidents used to have vital diseases that we didn’t even know about, we know? we mean, have things swung so distant a other approach that we have to have this micro-transparency, David?

BROOKS: Yeah, we start with a grounds that if these dual possibilities have been campaigning flattering tough for about a year and a half, regulating around a country, giving all these speeches, lifting all this money, they’re substantially in extraordinary health, generally given their age.


BROOKS: If – if they – if we’re going to have some health reveal, to me – and if this is probable – it would be about Alzheimer’s. If they have a heart conflict or get ill in some genuine way, we’ll understanding with it. But Alzheimer’s is a genuine thing, and it can impact we subtly. And that – if we can have some denote about that, that seems to be a many expected – a many critical thing that we should know.

MCEVERS: we also consternation if there is a double customary when it comes to transparency. we was listening to a Politics podcast, and NPR’s Asma Khalid was articulate about how, when Republicans are asked about this, they wish Clinton to be some-more transparent. And afterwards Democrats, of course, wish Trump to be some-more transparent. What’s going on here, E.J.?

DIONNE: Well, we consider Clinton, after this week, has to flip a clarity script. She’s a one who’s put out over 30 years of taxation returns. He hasn’t put out anything and shows no signs of ever doing so. She has indeed put out some-more fact on her health than he has.

And so we consider she’s got to start arguing and seeking a media to demeanour during a fact that she, comparatively speaking, has been utterly forthcoming. And it’s loyal that we ask some-more of presidential possibilities on these matters than we used to. we consider that’s a greeting to how many possibilities used to secrete in a past. And, although, we don’t get unequivocally vehement reading LDL numbers, myself.

MCEVERS: (Laughter) That’s E.J. Dionne of The Washington Post and Brookings Institution and David Brooks of The New York Times. Thanks, both of you.

BROOKS: Thank you.

DIONNE: Thank you.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit a website terms of use and permissions pages during www.npr.org for serve information.

NPR transcripts are combined on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and constructed regulating a exclusive transcription routine grown with NPR. This content might not be in a final form and might be updated or revised in a future. Accuracy and accessibility might vary. The lawful record of NPR’s programming is a audio record.

In : Politics

About the author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (required)



Mojo Marketplace