Tony Kornheiser says a Wizards are ‘dissolving’

No Comment 1 View

(By Jonathan Newton / The Washington Post)

The Wizards have had a terrible February, though one good thing came out of it. Sort of. Lots of people chimed in on what’s wrong with a Wizards, that creates them feel applicable in a approach their bad teams of a new past never were. Better to be ruthlessly savaged than ignored, we always say.

“What’s wrong with a Washington Wizards?” The Starters asked during their Thursday show, kicking off a lengthy, nuanced and reasonable contention of a team’s ills, that wasn’t quite quotable, since it was lengthy, nuanced and reasonable.

“What’s wrong with a Wizards?” Grantland’s Andrew Sharp asked, arguing that “the genuine calamity here is a group that’s usually good adequate to make we caring and usually clueless adequate to make we miserable.”

“Uh, Guys? we Think The Wizards Forgot To Fire Randy Wittman?” Deadspin’s Albert Burneko suggested, essay that “precise and strained execution can usually lift a bad devise to mediocrity, a meant to that a gifted and once-promising Wizards are regressing during damn nearby supersonic speed.”

“They’re dissolving,” Tony Kornheiser said on “PTI” Thursday evening. “This is a initial year they’ve had expectations. They started out great. If we demeanour during them now: 0-5, 2-10 and 4-12 [stretches]. Coaches get dismissed for that when teams have expectations.”

“But not during this indicate in a season,” Michael Wilbon said.

“Randy Wittman’s name is out there as somebody who’s unequivocally being scrutinized,” Kornheiser said.

“He is, though that’s not going to occur between now and a playoffs,” Wilbon said.

In fact, that same doubt of Wittman’s pursuit confidence was brought adult progressing Thursday on Kornheiser’s ESPN 980 program.

“Already in a NBA there are whispers entrance down about Randy Wittman,” ESPN contributor Brian Windhorst said. “And Ted Leonsis is famous for his patience, and we consider his calm will last. But already I’ve got people in a joining articulate about how that pursuit is going to maybe be open after this year. And that is not a good situation. Now, he’s faced a vigour before and rallied back, though this is a opposite epoch for this Wizards team, as we good know Tony. There’s a vital disproportion in a NBA when we flip a page to being a group of expectations as against to a group of potential. They were a group of intensity final year; now they’re a group of expectations.”

The hunt for an reason led Wilbon to an wholly opposite place.

“What about Sam Cassell?” he asked. “Is it probable those immature guards, John Wall and Bradley Beal, skip an partner manager who pushed them, who pushed a right buttons, who accepted them, who had rings on his fingers? we consider a Wizards skip Sam Cassell, and there’s zero they can do about it, since he’s in L.A….Tony, they strike a wall. we wish a Wizards can rebound back, since they’re a good story this year.”

TNT’s Kenny Smith was a singular pundit to indeed concentration on Washington’s defensive shortcomings.

“They’re in a freefall right now,” he pronounced on Comcast SportsNet’s SportsTalk Live. “After a all-star mangle and right before, we usually suspicion that they haven’t unequivocally finished a things that done them successful. And we suspicion it was a lot of round transformation and a lot of physique movement, where now we see a lot of standing, generally on a defensive end.

“A lot of times we demeanour during transformation and physique transformation on a descent end, though on a defensive end, guileless any other, we don’t see that as [much] as we did progressing in a deteriorate for some reason. And we don’t know what clicked off and why, that success that they had and they tasted, they’re not savoring to have some-more of. It seems like they became content.”

Meanwhile, on his radio show, Kornheiser zeroed in on Wall and Wittman.

“They are awful right now,” he said. “They’re in freefall. we can't stress this enough. They mislaid to a terrible terrible group [Wednesday] night….There was that duration of time about a entertain to a third by a deteriorate where all of a writers got unequivocally stacked about how good John Wall is, and they pounded people who didn’t contend that John Wall was a biggest actor in a Eastern Conference. They were in conflict mode. People during The Washington Post did that, in conflict mode.

“And now, what some-more people start to comprehend if they watch these games, is that Wall is an fine shooter. He’s an normal shooter. He’s not a good shooter. He’s okay. He’s an okay passer. But what his simple arms is is speed. He can get to a edge all a time. He’s fanciful during converting layups and gripping we in a game. But in situations now, if that is his many simple weapon, speed, and nobody around him is doing anything or appears to be interested, that is negated by a rest of his team. And he hasn’t found a way, and he’s got his assists, though they’re not winning. Something is wrong there.

“And with Randy Wittman — and I’m not perplexing to be disastrous about Randy Wittman — though there are some cities where if this late in a season, with a group that we suspicion was a contender, when we go 0-6 2-12 and 4-14, that somebody fires somebody. That happens. we don’t consider it’s going to occur here. we don’t consider it’s deserved here….The same people who pounded everybody who pronounced that Wall wasn’t a biggest man in a universe are now commencement to land on Wittman, aren’t they?”

Windhorst ticked off a few other issues.

“Wall is struggling. Wall is not carrying as many event to emanate space,” he said. “Their large guys are not personification good on a unchanging basis. And they were not means to make an impactful further during a deadline….So it’s severely concerning. And also what we consider is concerning is I’m not saying many of a fight.”

About the author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked (required)

*

code

Mojo Marketplace